We simply don’t have access to that kind of gear. Notably, this isn’t the kind of bleeding-edge rig you’ll see on some excellent high-end gaming reviews from people like LTT, Gamer’s Nexus, or JayzTwoCents. An EVGA 1000 P3 1000W PSU (80 PLUS Platinum).
Then, we tested these same cards in our usual Photoshop, Lightroom Classic, and Capture One Pro benchmarks to show why most photographers are better off saving some money and buying a last-gen GPU.Īll of the tests below were performed in my personal editing rig, which I built about six months ago. To that end, we put the shiny new RTX 4090 Founder’s Edition graphics card that NVIDIA sent over up against three of its little siblings from last year: the RTX 3070, RTX 3080, and RTX 3090 Founder’s Edition, all new-in-box before this test, all running inside the exact same PC.įirst, we put these cards through a slew of high-powered synthetic benchmarks that test things like 3D rendering and Ray Tracing in order to highlight the kinds of massive performance gains you can expect if you work in high-end visual effects or 3D design.
But we did say “yes” because we wanted to answer a different, more relevant question: do photo editors need a GPU at all? And if so, how much do you need to spend to get top-notch photo editing performance? When NVIDIA reached out to ask if we wanted to try the new RTX 4090 GPU, we almost said “no.” Most of our readers are photographers, and most photo editing simply doesn’t require a top-tier GPU.
0 kommentar(er)
